Articles Posted in Products Liability

More than 70 people have joined together to sue ConAgra Foods for personal injury. ConAgra is the packaged food company that produces some of the jars of Peter Pan Peanut Butter and Great Value Peanut Butter. Other individual lawsuits are also pending.

ConAgra has agreed to a recall of the jars of peanut butter, but says that the connection between its products and a salmonella outbreak in its peanut butter jars has not been proven.

The Food and Drug Administration is telling anyone who has a jar of Great Value (product code 2111) or Peter Pan peanut butter that has been purchased anytime since October 2004 to throw the peanut butter out.

Only one plant in Georgia is said to have been the cause of the salmonella-infected peanut butter jars. ConAgra is asking people who throw out their jars of peanut butter to keep the lids for a full refund.

Every year, about 50,000 salmonella infection cases are reported, with 600 people dying from salmonella poisoning. Children are especially susceptible to the illness because of their underdeveloped immune system, and kids ages 4 and under make up 30% of reported salmonella incidents.

A foodborne sickness that comes from the salmonella bacteria in animals, salmonella infection can be transmitted in water, soil, raw meats, eggs, and animal feces. Vomiting, fever, headaches, abdominal cramps, diarrhea (sometimes with blood), and other symptoms can occur in kids with salmonella if they aren’t treated. Later symptoms can include a “rose spotted” skin rash, an enlarged liver or spleen, and a stronger chance of becoming ill with pneumonia or meningitis.

If you have been injured or become ill because of a manufactured product, you may be able to file a products liability claim. A manufacturer, producer, or seller can be held liable in a product liability lawsuit for placing a defective or dangerous product into the marketplace and making available it available to consumers.

In products liability claims, products can refer to many kinds of products, including:
• Food
• Medical tools
• Construction tools
• Machines
• Medicines
• Weapons
• Toys
• Trucks
• Cars
• Bicycles
• Clothes
• Toxic substances
• Household appliances
• Household products
• Motorcycles

Legal grounds for filing a product liability claim after someone has been injured or killed because of a dangerous product can include:

• Negligence in design, manufacturing, testing, or marketing
• Breach of warranty if seller did not uphold their warranty guarantee
• Misrepresentation that a product is other than what it is or less dangerous than it is—resulting in injury or death by consumers
• Strict liability, holding the manufacturer or the seller liable for the injuries caused by the product defect

Continue reading ›

Howard County Police Chief William J. McMahon wants the County Council to repeal a law banning the use of stun guns because he wants to equip several of his officers with Tasers.

The handheld stun gun incapacitates a person for five seconds by shooting probes into that person’s skin. Several high profile reports regarding the misuse of stun guns, however, have caused policy makers to be very cautious when considering approving their use.

For example, a taser gun was used on a 6-year-old school boy at his school’s office in Miami, while a police officer in Orlando, Florida used a stun gun on a suspect who was chained to a hospital bed and was not a threat to the officer. Taser International, the company that supplies Taser stun guns, is facing about 50 personal injury and product liability lawsuits.

According to Amnesty International, approximately 61 people died in the US in 2005 after being shocked with a Taser repeatedly.

Last August, Taser International settled class action lawsuits with its shareholders for approximately $20 million. Its shareholders accused the company of exaggerating its product’s safety. However, the Company did not admit to any wrongdoing.

Hudson County Police Chief McMahon says he believes that with the proper training, misuse by police officers can be prevented.

The personal injury lawfirm of Lebowitz and Mzhen represents clients who have been injured due to someone else’s negligence in personal injury and products liability lawsuits.

Personal injury claims and lawsuits happen when a person is injured by someone else’s careless or intentionally negligent act. If a person is deemed legally responsible for injuring another person, then they are liable for causing the injury and may be required to compensate the injured person for the damage caused. Compensatory damages are intended to help a person recover from their injury and pay their medical and recovery costs so that they may, to the best extent possible, be restored to the same condition and quality of life that they had before the accident. Punitive damages may also be awarded in a personal injury case. The monetary award is intended to punish the person responsible for the injury.

A person who is injured using a product that is damaged or dangerous may be able to file a products liability lawsuit. The lawsuit can be brought against any company or person that was involved in making or distributing the product. A court may order compensatory or punitive damages in a products liability lawsuit.

Continue reading ›

In one of the many thousands of products liability Vioxx-related lawsuits that have been brought against Merck and Co., a Texas judge upheld a ruling that held the pharmaceutical company responsible for the death of Leonel Garza.

Garza died in 2001 from a heart attack believed to have been caused by taking Vioxx. Last April, a jury ruled that Merck was liable and awarded Garza’s family $32 million in damages. Judge Alex Gabert, however, said that the award amount violated Texas’s strict limit on compensatory and punitive damages. He reduced the damage amount to $8.7 million.

Merck plans to ask for a new trial because of information revealing that there had been a financial relationship between Felicia Garza, Leonel’s widow, and one of the jury members responsible for the original verdict.

The victory is good news for other Vioxx plaintiffs because it showed that a court had agreed that even short-term use of Vioxx can lead to severe side effects. More than 27,000 lawsuits have been filed against Merck. A New Orleans federal judge, however, said plaintiffs could not file a class action lawsuit and that each case had to be filed separately. Merck has won most of its cases thus far.

The pharmaceutical company had pulled the drug from the shelf in 2004 after a study revealed that long-term use of the drug can double a patient’s risk of a coronary event.

Continue reading ›

Contact Information